Lexis Alert

THE ONLINE publisher Lexis Nexis seems to be sending freelances a new agreement. It contains not only a copyright assignment, but also an indemnity clause. That is, it wants the freelance to pay the costs of legal cases that may arise from the published piece.

The company's justification for this is a piece of US legislation called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This puzzled us at first, because this law was presented as one mandating openness and accountability in corporations' boards and management.

But then we found an article in Reason magazine reporting that investigators in the Valerie Plame leak case threatened Time-Life board members with jail if their journalists didn't give up their sources.

This of course has serious implications for media freedom in the US. The union is of course looking into it.

Immediately, the Freelance Office is talking to Lexis-Nexis and any NUJ member who has received one of these contracts should contact the office now.

Update 20 May 2006

  • Norman Pearlstine, at the time Editor-in-Chief of TIME Inc, responds that "while I had considered Sarbanes, it really had little if any impact on my decision [to comply with a court order.] I don't believe it had much if any impact on special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald [in seeking the order]. He had all the authority he needed in the Supreme Court's Branzburg ruling that requires reporters to testify before a grand jury about their confidential sources."
Last modified: 20 May 2006 - © 2006 contributors
The Freelance editor is elected by London Freelance Branch and responsibility for content lies solely with the editor of the time
Send comments to the editor: editor@londonfreelance.org